Front Hum Neurosci. 2011; 5 : 54.
You have seen the artwork of British Photographer Eadward Muybridge in some of our videos and online education programs (with credit). Here is a Google Doodle based on “The Horse in Motion” you may enjoy. Click on the picture to follow the link.
The Gait Guys
Have a great day!
Curse of the Bunion
Hi Dr. Allen,
“The first ray is an inherently unstable axial array that relies on a fine balance between its static (capsule, ligaments, and plantar fascia) and dynamic stabilizers (peroneus longus and small muscles of the foot) to maintain its alignment. In some feet, there is a genetic predisposition for a nonlinear osseous alignment or a laxity of the static stabilizers that disrupts this muscle balance. Many inherent or acquired biomechanical abnormalities are identified in feet with hallux valgus. However, these associations are incomplete and nonlinear. In any patient, a number of factors have to come together to cause the hallux valgus.”
- the “turn out” predisposes the foot to more pronation which can easily destabilize the medial foot tripod anchoring of the 1st metatarsal to the ground. This will change the pull of the adductor hallucis causing the hallux to drift laterally and the 1st metatarsal to drift medially widening the gap between the 1st and 2nd metatarsals (ie. the intermetatarsal angle).
- dancers also axially load the hallux. This is called “en pointe”. Please read our prior blog post on “en pointe” (click here). As you can see in the video above, the angle at the big toe (the 1st metatarsophalangeal joint) immediately begins to drift into hallux valgus. Continuing to do this will render this poor gal a nasty bunion in time we highly suspect. These are the challenges that dancers put into the foot. Once the hallux drifts laterally the first metatarsal loses more anchoring capacity at the medial foot tripod and the viscous cycle continues.
- Remember, a bunion is a soft tissue adventitious mal-development. It is often erroneously confused as a bony proliferation at the medial joint, the knuckle area. This is not the case. Hallux valgus drives the metatarsal head medially and exposes the head of the bone medially giving the appearance of a bump (the “bunion”). In fact, the bunion is an inflamed or adventitious bursal sac combined with the prominence of the MET head and angry inflammed skin, ligaments, joint capsule etc
Friday Follies:
Going through our archived pictures, we ran across this shot of Dr Ivo with Frank Shorter (Center) at last years Newton Conference that The Gait Guys were invited to speak at.
Knowing that Dr Ivo plays the bass, and is a former rock star, we are always searching for posts which may include a musical reference (even if peripheral). We closely compared some pictures of Alice Cooper (Left and Right) with Frank Shorter.
Hmmm…. Could Frank be Alice? The similarities are uncanny….This is an Uber compliment if you ask us !
Arnold Palmer, Gait & The difference between Muscle Tightness vs Muscle Shortness.
/Arnold Palmer did not exactly have the prettiest golf swing but we doubt too many are going to argue that in the height of his uber successful professional career he should mess with it.
One of the gait guys used to date (eons ago) a gal who’s father used to be on the PGA tour. (Although it was not the case, Go ahead and accuse us of using her to get to him ! We have no shame. LOL). We got to golf with him once a week. Needless to say there were deep lessons each time they went out. Some days it was “today we will play with a 7 iron and a putter and nothing more”. But one lesson that really stuck out was …. “Don’t be afraid to bet against the golfer with a beautiful swing who can golf well most days…… be afraid to bet against the golfer with a butt-ugly swing that always hits the middle of the green in 2 strokes every single time.”
Now, this may be a confusing point. What this meant in the golf world was that if you do something enough times, no matter how bad it looks, you will get really consistent and accurate with it. You can bet on it. Now this does not mean there is not a better way, a smarter way, a more economical way. Ask any golfer who cannot hit a driver but can groove a 3 wood and they will tell you they will pick out the 3 wood every time in friendly competition over the risk of driving the ball off the Tee with the driver at the risk of entering the woods or deep rough. That does not mean that picking up the driver at the range and getting some lessons would have a better and wiser outcome in time.
Our point here today is that many times there is a better way, our bodies just cannot always find that better way on the working body parts available. Hitting the driver is just a different skill set and needs some different skills and work to harness its benefits. When we cannot find a “better way”, because of muscle inhibition from an injury or from challenged anatomy (ie. forefoot varus) or for some other reason, the body will attempt a reasonable strategy. It will be a strategy to protect the involved joints, to maximize ranges of motion and over all limb function, as best as possible. Sometimes this works for a short while, sometimes for months or years. But it is usually inevitable that the compensation will fail or the repetitive nature of the tasks will tax the tissues and end in pain or injury.
Sometimes we find a better way on our own, sometimes we need help to find a better way around problems. Heck, we all need crutches for a sprained ankle from time to time, but after the first few weeks we do not continue to use the crutches. Eventually function must be restored. Either the pristine biomechanically correct function, or a compensation pattern. One is optimal with little consequences, the other is suboptimal. The real trick is knowing if you have the optimal pattern or if you are adding strength and putting miles on the compensation pattern. Sometimes it is hard to tell.
We will choose conscious incompetence any day over unconscious incompetence. We would rather know we are doing something wrong so we can correct it, or at least be able to monitor it.
So, next time you are foam rolling your “tight” IT Band or stretching out your tight calf……. we hope you will ask the question, “am I bandaiding the problem or am I fixing the problem?” Remember, tightness and shortness are not the same beast. One is a neuro-protective phenomenon and the other is just plain vanilla shortness. One needs stretched and the other craves the strength around the joint to afford the protective tightness (the heightened tone) some resolve.
Athough we love Arnold Palmer, we bet had someone caught him early enough in his young career he would have opted for the optimal swing as opposed to what we all grew to know.
Now, go watch the Masters on TV !
Four !
Shawn and Ivo
Shoe Retail Thursday: Today we have a client in some shoes that appear to be a good match, until you look more closely. See if you can see it.
“ Just because the shoe fits, doesn’t mean you should wear it ! ”- The Gait Guys
First of all, we apologize for the crummy video. But we were scouring through some old stuff while working on our long awaited “Shoe Fit” program and this video just had to be shown. This is a short video, you might get some vertigo from the nasty camera work. Sorry about that.
Initially this client looks great from behind. The rear foot looks neutral, no valgus heel collapse into rearfoot pronation and no over burdening of the lateral crash zone (lateral/outside tipping of the shoe into supination). If anything could be said, they look like there could be a subtle rearfoot supination from the initial shot before they start to walk.
We are also not sure what shoe this is, we do however know it is a New Balance stability shoe from the video. This client had purchased these shoes 1-2 weeks prior in a trusted high end specialty running store. As the client walks away from us everything looks pretty good. We could point out some subtleties but those are not the point of our talk today. It is not until they come walking back that something is clearly wrong. Did you see it ? The LEFT foot is drastically supinating displaying a lateral weight bearing shift all the way through toe off.
Now, on the surface this is a simple case. (We just shot a concept video last night to take this blog post today to the next level. We will present it next week once we get it edited.) But the points we need you to understand today are :
- Just because someone has a flat foot standing in front of you does not mean they need a stability shoe. We see plenty of folks who are serious walkers, runners all the way up to professional athletes who have flatter, or flattened, medial longitudinal arches but still have very strong competent feet. There are ethnic groupings that have flat feet. So just because a foot looks flat does not mean one should reach for a stability shoe or an orthotic or additional foot bed insert. This client had flatter arches but had competent feet. They also had some issues of tibial torsion that negated some of the challenges of flatter feet. So, our point here is what you see is not always what you get, nor what you should fix either for that matter.
- What should happen in a shoe does not always truly happen. This means you have missed some calculations or you simply do not have enough experiential wisdom to predict the oddities in certain situations or with the given anatomy of a given athlete. This comes in time, with experience.
- Sometimes supination is not really supination. This client has a flatter foot. Flatter feet do not supinate well. Ok, better put they run out of time to supinate the foot because they have spent too much time into the pronation phase. However, they also could have weakness in the supinatory mechanisms to drive it adequately. Remember, some clients will fall into their weaknesses and some will strategize to avoid the weaknesses if they have enough body awareness and strength to do so. They just do not seem to have the skills to find the more appropriate pattern to correct the underlying issues. But there is certainly something positive to be said to knowing you have a problem and that you are cheating around it rather than being oblivious.
This case was possibly, maybe even likely, one of several problems:
- wrong shoe for the foot type
- possibly a faulty shoe fabrication
- poor strategy to make for a rigid foot structure
This case also draws clinical inquiry into:
- whether there is weakness of the ankle and forefoot everting muscles namely the peronei and extensor digitorum longus and brevis. * This the topic of the video we are producing because these muscles have huge implications in the cross over gait (which we have senselessly beat you all with in previous blog posts) at the lower end of the limb.
Who are we ? The Gait Guys…… Shawn and Ivo. The dynamic duo of all things gait.
Neuromechanics Weekly: Gait and Running and the Crossed Extensor Responses
This week we discuss why upper and lower limbs are paired in gait, and the neuronal wiring that is involved.
Yup, this is pretty geeky stuff, but geez…isn’t it nice to know WHY something works? Think of the implications if YOU DON’T see the upper and lower limb pairing. Think of the implications during rehab. One limb SHOULD be doing the opposite of the other AND always look at the upper limbs and arm swing. Yes, the central nervous system is involved. It is more than just biomechanics, perhaps this is why this stuff comes easier to us because of our deeper neurology background. The whole is greater than the sum of the parts….
Ivo and Shawn
More on Micah and the future of ultra marathoning: click for AP article link
Quiz: Let’s see how your blog reading has been going.
These 5 photos are of a 2.5 year old child brought into your office for evaluation by his father. They have been seen by another practitioner who has given him orthotics with full length varus posts to wear.
- What do you see?
- What is your assessment?
- What do you tell the parent?
In the standing views, what stands out?
- a moderate rearfoot (calcaneal) valgus (ie. rear foot medial heel collapse)
- the flattened medial longitudinal arches of the foot ( ie. a little flat footed)
- the genu valgus (ie. knees are a little “knock knee’d”)
- he bears weight separately on each lower extremity as you can see from the pictures. He never bears weight on both limb symmetrically, there is much weight bearing shifting meaning there is always a dominant limb bearing most of the weight.
- the knees face inward in the standing position
- the feet point outward (with the knees straight) in the supine position
did you see all of these?
What is your assessment?
1, 2) pes planus and hyperpronation are the norm for children under 6 years of age
3) genu valgus is not abnormal in children, with many presenting maximally at age 3, and usually resolving by age 9 (see our post here)
4) he bears weight separately on each lower extremity (L>R from rear, R>L from front) so there probably is not a leg length discrepancy. This is often a hip-core stability issue and as fatigue sets in weight bearing shift is automatized.
5,6) This child has external tibial torsion. As seen in the supine photo, when the knees face forward, the feet have an increased progression angle (they turn out). We are born with some degree / or little to none, tibial torsion and the in-toeing of infants is due to the angle of the talar neck (30 degrees) and femoral anteversion (the angle of the neck of the femur and the distal end is 35 degrees). The lower limbs rotate outward at a rate of approximately 1.5 degrees per year to reach a final angle of 22 degrees….. that is of course if the normal derotation that a child’s lower limbs go through occurs timely and completely.
What do you tell the parent?
1,2) Although research shows that wearing arch supports (navicular wedge or “cookie”, not a full varus wedge as was the case here) can speed development of the the arches, they will in fact most often develop regardless of supportive footwear or support. Many studies show that footwear impairs muscular development of the foot. One study showed that arch supports in children prevent derotation of the talar head and promote development of a Rothbart Foot Type. How about some flexible shoes (or no shoes) for the boy? (need to review the Rothbart foot type ? click here for one of our very first blog posts on the topic)
3. We will measure the genu valgus and track it every 6 months to make sure it is regressing. If it persists or becomes worse, we may address it then. How about having your kid walk barefoot?
4. no worries, he is resting each side as the other fatigues. Endurance development takes time, just like marathon training. For gosh sake, the kid is 2.5 years old. Give him a break !
5,6) We will measure his progression angle and degree of torsion every 6 months (along with the genu valgus). This is normal up to reaching skeletal maturity.
Well, how did you do?
Corrective exercises are always nice, but when is too soon? Can their immature nervous system handle it ? CAn they comprehend the exercise ? Sometimes turning them into a game and taking what you can get is good enough to help promote healthy limb derotation. Walking with the toes up helps develop arch independence and helps to teach the brain about the foot tripod. But at 2.5 years old, good luck expecting more than that.
The Gait Guys: two handsome bald guys (one by genetics, and one by aspiring choice) aging gracefully and promoting foot and gait literacy, one case at a time.
Ultrarunning Running has lost one of it’s best, the 58 year old from Boulder Colorado, Micah True. Full story of what we know here: http://abcnews.go.com/US/micah-true-ultrarunners-body-found-mexicos-wilderness/story?id=16048218#.T3j03e3Da20
Often times, we find ourselves in a difficult place, often because we made a bad decision. Sometimes, we are in a difficult place because someone decides for us. We must remember that only you have the power to change. If you do not know things are supposed to be different, then they don’t have to be.
Confucius once said “It does not matter how slowly you go so long as you do not stop.”
On your quest, don’t stop
Have a great Sunday
Ivo and Shawn